Opposition Parties ought to
prune themselves
By Amare
Mulugeta's
call for the opposition to prune itself is a timely call worth
repeating. I often wonder as to what drives the opposition to have
the 'leftovers', Yes, the leftovers, in their midst as leaders.
Knowing fully well their past misdeed not to mention their crime,
why on earth do they want to install them as leaders? They and they
only know the answer to this question.
Mulugeta
did not condone the killing of 36 citizens. His theme in that
article is directed primarily to exposing the hypocritical
cries of the remnants of the past. I
don't see any wrong in brining to light this truth. In so doing, he
might have come across as if he is false sympathy for the terrible
incident that befallen on Ethiopia in recent days.
In spite of the screaming and the shouting we hear from the
different political persuasions and their loyalist, one fact always
remains true and unchangeable. That is this:
The majority of Ethiopians both at home and abroad want peace
and peaceful transfer of power from one political group to another
based solely on the verdict of the people on the ballot box. We all
should contribute in whatever way we can to the coming to fruition
of this long standing aspiration of the Ethiopian people. We must
expose and object any group or group of people that is set to
frustrate this aspiration.
In
that spirit, many have been calling for the government to pledge and
once and for all settle with itself to hold a fair and clean
election with a motto ' �we
are ready to win or lose in a clean election: no more intimidation,
no more election marring�. Sadly, the government appears not to
completely follow this noble path. The people both at home and
abroad must continue demanding that they will not settle short of
having a '�government of
the people, by the people, for the people, and not a government
of the people, by the ruling political class, for the selected few, which
is what we have in Ethiopia. To that end they should continue to
struggle peacefully however arduous the struggle might get.
The
opposition also has a bigger responsibility to shoulder. Self
examination I believe is good start. Do they want to replace EPRDF
just in name? Or are they committed to advance the cause of freedom
and democracy? If so, what does it say to their image to have
remnants of the past regime in leadership position?
Make no mistake about it perception does matter. So, pruning
itself of this taint would be an asset and not a liability to the
opposition. Urging them to do so should be seen as a sage advice and
not as a 'name calling' and a scare tactic.
|