Aid
alone cannot assuredly be the solution to all of the continent�s
woes. More efforts should be directed to answering why
Africans are so poor when their continent is so rich
FPRIVATE
"TYPE=PICT;ALT=Pos Malaysia"
IF
the successes of Live 8 and Group of Eight (G8) summit are
anything to go by, one is tempted to conclude that major world
problems can be better handled by celebrities and artistes
rather than politicians.
Already many of them have been made ambassadors to tackle
issues and problems like HIV/AIDS, land mines, poverty and
even peace on behalf of the United Nations and other
international bodies.
Bob Geldof and Bono are the two leading examples of such
ambassadors that the world has known.
It was almost two decades ago that both of them led a host of
other singers and musicians to raise money for the Ethiopian
famine victims through the Live Aid concert.
They managed to attract more than 1.5 billion people in 100
countries live over television, raising awareness about the
levels of poverty plaguing humanity, of which Ethiopia was
just one of many examples.
As it turned out, in the ensuing years, the world saw many
dramatic changes that affected millions of lives. The Berlin
Wall came down and united not only two nations but thousands
of families that were kept apart due to political and
ideological divides.
Then came the Internet which multiplied the capacity of people
to interact and communicate, creating a more unified world.
Aided by cellular telephones and other ICT devices, the world
increasingly became one.
However, Ethiopia is still in shambles. Tens of thousands of
people are still dying every day due to hunger. Diseases like
HIV/AIDS continue to devastate the global community. Much like
terrorism, they have kept the international community apart.
Political leaders from even the world�s richest have not
been able to solve the problems. At times, they have become
part of the problems as well.
The doctrine of "us versus them", and that of divide
and rule are some of the reasons why.
Early this month, much like the Live Aid of 1985, Live 8 came
to the rescue. The concerts were held in no less than 10
cities, mainly of the developed world.
An estimated two billion watched it on television and more
than one million at the various venues.
In London, among the songs performed were the Beatles� The
Long and Winding Road which aptly explained the need for a
second global concert.
"Make Poverty History" is the slogan, directed
mainly at Africa.
Live 8 was timed to coincide with the meeting of the political
leaders of the G8 in Edinburgh, Scotland.
The multi-country musical event was aimed at ensuring the
politicians would not belt out the same tired song with the
same old tune.
At stake was a package of debt relief and increased aid for
the continent, as well as the lowering of trade barriers so
that the African agricultural produce can access Western
markets more easily.
In short, while the G8 summit is a nice platform for more
feel-good statements, its translation into reality was more of
a concern to the international community. The success of the
previous G8 summits, at best, can only be described as
partial.
Some of the questions the G8 was asked were indeed very
searching.
For example, why does the host country of G8 provide aid to an
African country when its president is said to suppress the
population and refuses to relinquish power?
Why is Africa seen as a "poor" continent when it has
among the richest natural resources in the world? Why is the
world still indifferent to the genocide and conflict in
Darfur?
A survey of 10,000 Africans to gauge opinions hinted at some
answers. The majority blamed their own politicians (49 per
cent) for the continent�s woes, compared to 16 per cent who
blamed former colonial powers, and 11 per cent rich countries.
The answer, of course, lies somewhere in between. Local
politicians and colonial powers and the rich often have common
interests that may prove to be an obstacle.
This is one reason why Geldof and his band of (wo)men are
regarded as an important expression of the people�s voice
that the G8 cannot simply ignore.
So far Geldof and friends can take pride that Live 8 is able
to exert some influence on the world policy agenda, though
there is still some unhappiness, particularly in relation to
trade liberalisation and global warming.
In fact, the French president has been quoted as saying that
Geldof and Bono are inspirations for the politicians.
There indications that some are considering nominating Geldof
as a candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize for marshalling
global support to fight poverty, which has been a neglected
cause. More so, in securing fresh commitment from the world�s
rich and powerful nations.
Be that as it may, it is time that the G8 leaders recognised
their involvement, in more ways than one, in getting Africa
and many other developing countries in the mess they are in
today.
It is therefore in their interest to sort out what they have
left behind as this is long overdue. This must be done not out
of a sense of magnanimity, as it is often made up to be, but
rather with a deep sense of responsibility, if not guilt.
Hence, as some have cautioned, Africa and the other
ex-colonies should not be made into a "beggar
continent". After all, it is acknowledged that aid alone
cannot assuredly be the solution to all of the continent�s
woes.
More efforts should be directed to answering why Africans are
so poor when their continent is so rich � at least they used
to be before the colonial days. When will the rape of the poor�s
resources and the brain drain stop?
These are some of the more difficult questions that beg to be
urgently answered if Africa and the developing countries,
indeed the entire world, is to get rid of global suffering and
poverty.
The fact that the G8 failed to address the urgent issue of
trade imbalances in terms of farm subsidies is an indication
that its intentions are already casting doubts over its best
of intentions.
This is especially so when many argued that removal of the
iniquitous system of agro-subsidies by the United States and
European countries would have a much more beneficial and
lasting effect on the African economies than increased aid or
debt relief.
Sadly, the axiom that beggars cannot be choosers is still the
reality today. So too the fact that the ex-colonial powers are
still calling the shots, long after departing from the
colonies.
Clearly, Geldof and friends may have to figure this out when
they plan the next concert. |